Comparison of the automation QA tools (7)

Data Functions WinRunner   Provides functions for Data-Driven test functions. You can program these functions directly to work with an excel spreadsheet or tab separated variable file or you can use built-in wizards. There is also a data table that you can populate.   QA Run   You can use Open functions for working with Read more…

SHARE THIS

Comparison of the automation QA tools (6)

Database Tests WinRunner   You can either test database content via ODBC and db_functions or via a database checkpoint. There is also a neat little function that allows you to import from a database into a data table.   QA Run   Provides most database functions. You can accomplish most things either by the functions Read more…

SHARE THIS

Comparison of the automation QA tools (5)

Ease of Use WinRunner   Not the easiest, but not that hard either. One very important and easy thing is use of wizard. If you have use wizards in Microsoft applications, then this tool is pretty easy to use.   QA Run   It’s very similar to ROBOT, but a bit harder to use than Read more…

SHARE THIS

Testing Estimation – 360logica

People simply assume it is impossible to estimate Test activities accurately. Test estimates are especially prone to problems because they often depend on other (unreliable) estimates. In fact, though, it is possible to estimate accurately; and huge direct and indirect benefits can result.

SHARE THIS

Comparison of the automation QA tools (4)

Cost WinRunner   Being one of the most reputable test tools tends to be expensive. Price depends on number of licenses purchased. Java add-in increases the cost to anywhere from $ 4000- 6000 per license   QA Run   Price is comparable to the price of Robot. Each license cost $2000-3500.   Silk Test   Read more…

SHARE THIS

Opensource Performance Testing Automation Frameworks

Development frameworks have been around for years, as a means for standardization and acceleration of the development process. The same reasoning applies to testing frameworks. Yet, in the past, many enterprises questioned its cost effectiveness as they questioned the need for test automation at all.

SHARE THIS

Comparison of the automation QA tools (3)

Environment Support WinRunner   Out of the box supports, all windows based system. With add-ins, support Java based applications.   QA Run   Supports NS-DK, Oracle, PowerBuilder, Visual Basic, Uniface (Compuware’s own 4GL), SAP, Java, Netscape, Internet explorer, and most windows applications   Silk Test   Supports HTML, XML, JavaScript, Java, ActiveX, Windows 2000, Windows Read more…

SHARE THIS

Comparison of the automation QA tools (2)

Web Support WinRunner   To start a web browser in WinRunner, you need to use the web_browser_invoke function and also enable the WebTest add-in. One disadvantage with WinRunner is that it does not support Java out of the box. You have to buy a Java add-in. That makes WinRunner more expensive than other tools. But Read more…

SHARE THIS

Comparison of the automation QA tools (1)

Record and Playback   WinRunner   Has a recording facility allowing you to record in either context sensitive mode or in analogue mode. It has rich command line functions that allow you to run the scripts on start up. WinRunner recognizes two variable types: number or a string. There is no need to declare variables Read more…

SHARE THIS