Bug fixing is a challenging and time-consuming process, especially when there are additional layers of code. However, bug fixing looks easier if it is done as soon as they are traced.
The Need of Continuous Integration (CI)
There is a certain cost associated with each fix in a code. So, a system with thousand bugs is surely going to increase the overall cost. However, each defect has its own priority, with majority of them making least impact on performance. But, this might lead to crashes, usability issues, etc. if the defects are poorly prioritized. In addition, the defects which might look least important to you can lead to loopholes in security.
With Continuous Integration (CI) you can test and verify all the modifications during the development cycle and implement it throughout the project. In addition, CI allows attaining product’s stability by reporting present state of the project to the management. This boost the activities related to marketing and planning by ensuring everything works according to the plan.
Continuous Integration (CI) Challenges
In spite of so many positives about CI, there are a number of challenges while implementing it. Some of them are discussed below.
- It’s very difficult to ensure full accuracy of the entire product’s test. However, if you expect accuracy in build results, you must consider your CI server like a fresh one. You must inform the server about the product being developed by running appropriate scripts. In addition, each build should be isolated and must be clearly described.
- For small applications, standalone checkouts can be initiated at the beginning. However, with the growth in functionality, the situation might become complex.
- Continuous Integration (CI) is often inappropriately operated by large teams or which involves too many people. You must create sub-teams and assign new roles and responsibilities for them.
- A poorly designed architecture creates more complexity than anything else. There must be a proper integration between different components. A feasible solution lies with the component-based integration, which works well with the software with different functionalities.
- Tests must be reliable and repeatable. Intermediate failures must be avoided that might lead to other errors.
- The requirements change according to the feedback given to the management. This can create a situation where the already created code or the code that has been used in the build becomes useless. In addition, it leads to the loss of valid code and creates a lot of confusion.
So, in order to avoid any deep flaws, you must consider using the methods that fit best in your projects.
you might also like: Continuous Integration of Selenium Automation framework using Hudson
